Profhilo Structura

Both treatments are part of the Profhilo family, but they have been designed for different concerns.

Profhilo is primarily used to improve skin hydration, skin quality, and overall skin health.

Profhilo Structura focuses on something different. It has been developed to target the superficial fat layers that help support the natural shape and contours of the face.

Simply put, Profhilo is generally selected when skin quality is the primary concern, while Profhilo Structura may be considered when your face has started to look softer, flatter, or less defined than it once did.

Dermal fillers are often used to restore volume, support, or definition in a particular area of the face.

Profhilo Structura was developed with a different goal in mind. Rather than focusing on one specific feature, it targets the superficial fat layers that help support the overall shape of the face.

You might think of fillers as being used to enhance or support a particular area, while Profhilo Structura is often considered when the face as a whole feels softer, flatter, or less supported than it did in the past.

For some people, fillers may be the most appropriate option. For others, Profhilo Structura may be a better fit. Sometimes a combination approach is recommended.

This is something Jane will assess carefully during your consultation.

That is always the aim.

Most people who enquire about Profhilo Structura aren’t looking to change their appearance. They simply want to feel that their face reflects how they feel inside.

The treatment is designed to support natural facial contours rather than create obvious volume or dramatic change.

Jane’s approach is always to work with your existing features, helping you look refreshed and well supported while still looking completely like yourself.

Most treatment plans begin with two sessions, usually spaced about four weeks apart.

The exact approach will depend on the shape and structure of your face, the changes you’re noticing, and what you’re hoping to achieve.

During your consultation, Jane will explain what she feels is likely to give you the most natural and balanced result.

Yes, sometimes.

Although they are part of the same treatment family, they are designed to address different concerns.

Profhilo focuses on skin hydration and skin quality, while Profhilo Structura focuses on supporting the superficial fat layers that contribute to facial shape and support.

Because of this, some people benefit from both treatments as part of a broader treatment plan.

Jane will discuss whether this may be appropriate for you during your consultation.

Significant weight loss can sometimes affect the face, leaving it looking flatter, softer, or more hollow than before.

You may have heard people refer to this as “Ozempic face”, as it’s a common concern among people taking GLP-1 weight loss medications such as Ozempic or Mounjaro. In reality, these changes can occur after any significant weight loss, regardless of how the weight was lost.

Profhilo Structura may be one option that Jane discusses if you’ve noticed these types of changes.

However, every face is different, and the most appropriate approach will depend on the extent of the changes and the result you’re hoping to achieve.

This is why a personalised consultation is always the best place to start.

Not necessarily.

The treatment may be suitable for people who are noticing changes in facial support, contour, or definition, but it won’t be the right option for everyone.

Jane will assess your facial structure, skin quality, medical history, and treatment goals before making a recommendation.

Sometimes Profhilo Structura will be the best fit. Sometimes another treatment may be more appropriate. Her priority is helping you choose the option that is most likely to achieve the result you’re looking for.